Monday, February 20, 2012
Update on Invisible
After going on a writing marathon over the weekend (on Saturday night, I clocked in at a NaNoWriMo-esque 5,208 words), I am about 94% complete with this novel project. If I keep at my pace of about 2,000 words a day, I should finish Part 4 by the end of the month and the epilogue can be done in less than three days. Ah yes, the end is in sight. Early March is the time and place. Mark your calendars, kids!
Okay, I wasn't gonna say anything about this, but now I'm gonna!
VH1 recently released a revision of the 100 Greatest Women in Rock 'n Roll (now just Music, probably better since all the ladies were in different genres) and as Flavorwire pointed out, they made some odd choices. Not to say these particular ladies of music didn't earn their time in the sun, they worked hard and sold many records, heaven knows. Not bringing one down to celebrate another. That's not how we roll here.
I understand that the new list is a reflection of new trends and a crop of new, very talented people that are now staking their own claims in this tough and misogynistic world of music. But y'all, they threw a TON of the previous list under the bus. Where the f*** is Stevie Nicks? Etta James? Aretha Franklin is not there anymore! Not even Sheila E.! (My "I wanna break everything" moment was Tina Weymouth.) Maybe it makes sense that they changed the name of the list, so the two lists could exist together? Okay, so you wanna get specific? The 1999 list reflects that. Wanna get more broad? The 2011 list reflects that. I guess.
I got curious and counted both lists to see how many women of color were represented. The 1999 list had over 35 women, the new list only 27 (I may have missed some people, so please correct me if I'm wrong). While the 1999 list could've included more, it did somewhat a better job in the genre department. The Supremes over in Motown pop, Tracy Chapman in folk , Aretha Franklin with her gospel/rock blend, and Gloria Estefan with her take on Latin pop. The new list has some variation, but it has more pop than R&B or even folk.
So maybe the new list should be 100 Greatest Women in Pop, since damn, most of them could fit there. Nothing wrong with that, but it's not an excellent representation of genres. I guess you could argue that for the 1999 list, but you don't have to strain to find more than just a variation of pop.
Kathy from Her Five Dollar Radio also put together another problem with the list (and maybe the problem with the previous list too). God forbid that VH1 acknowledges any woman's contribution to the band she's in, let along she kicks ass at her instrument of choice. And as for the last paragraph of Kathy's excellent take-away from the list, it is amazing that people (not the writer, of course) still think that women have to be invited into the rock world, let alone bust in, do their thing, and let the guys just kindly deal with it; which a lot of the women from both lists have done. They had to break the rules in order to become who they are. And yet, there are so many limitations these musicians have to battle.
No, we haven't come a long way. We have a long way to go.
I understand that the new list is a reflection of new trends and a crop of new, very talented people that are now staking their own claims in this tough and misogynistic world of music. But y'all, they threw a TON of the previous list under the bus. Where the f*** is Stevie Nicks? Etta James? Aretha Franklin is not there anymore! Not even Sheila E.! (My "I wanna break everything" moment was Tina Weymouth.) Maybe it makes sense that they changed the name of the list, so the two lists could exist together? Okay, so you wanna get specific? The 1999 list reflects that. Wanna get more broad? The 2011 list reflects that. I guess.
I got curious and counted both lists to see how many women of color were represented. The 1999 list had over 35 women, the new list only 27 (I may have missed some people, so please correct me if I'm wrong). While the 1999 list could've included more, it did somewhat a better job in the genre department. The Supremes over in Motown pop, Tracy Chapman in folk , Aretha Franklin with her gospel/rock blend, and Gloria Estefan with her take on Latin pop. The new list has some variation, but it has more pop than R&B or even folk.
So maybe the new list should be 100 Greatest Women in Pop, since damn, most of them could fit there. Nothing wrong with that, but it's not an excellent representation of genres. I guess you could argue that for the 1999 list, but you don't have to strain to find more than just a variation of pop.
Kathy from Her Five Dollar Radio also put together another problem with the list (and maybe the problem with the previous list too). God forbid that VH1 acknowledges any woman's contribution to the band she's in, let along she kicks ass at her instrument of choice. And as for the last paragraph of Kathy's excellent take-away from the list, it is amazing that people (not the writer, of course) still think that women have to be invited into the rock world, let alone bust in, do their thing, and let the guys just kindly deal with it; which a lot of the women from both lists have done. They had to break the rules in order to become who they are. And yet, there are so many limitations these musicians have to battle.
No, we haven't come a long way. We have a long way to go.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Hey, I'm still here!
Sorry for nothing after the last entry. I've been busy doing nothing, as usual, but I finally began working on Invisible again. Damn, took me way too long to begin working on it again. I noticed, as I was writing, that I was cringing what I was writing. Where are the details? Man, I can't paint a good picture of pure chaos. So, that what was truly holding me back. I was afraid of not doing it right the first time. Ahhh, but you never will get it right the first time. But the next time you will. Sounds like Billy Joel lyrics. (Yes, I was thinking of "Get It Right the First Time" from The Stranger.)
Either way, on that and doing some stuff to prepare for a most difficult job search, that will include possibly moving away in the next few months. We'll have to see.
On a lighter note, here is my (so far) favorite song of 2012:
Either way, on that and doing some stuff to prepare for a most difficult job search, that will include possibly moving away in the next few months. We'll have to see.
On a lighter note, here is my (so far) favorite song of 2012:
Filed under:
hey an update,
life of a writer,
novel project 2 the revenge,
whee music
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Time to break the quiet 'round here
Sorry for being gone so long, January was an odd month for me. Coupled with the fact that my application was rejected from Michener, I'm on the search for a job. My hope is that it's a full-time job up north so I have a good excuse to move this year. Atop that, I've been waking up too early the last two mornings and paying for it (doesn't help that I have work those two days also).
A few quick things. I hate to do this, but since plans have changed very much for me this year, I will be unable to do the following: The Year of Revisits and ScriptFrenzy. For the former, I still plan on reviewing A House Like A Lotus in tribute of its rerelease this year. I may even read and review a few other of my all-time favorites, but not going to dedicate each month to one. As for the latter, I'm just not feeling it. I rather do NaNoWriMo again, which may happen again this year, but we'll have to see.
I may give the grad school application business another try later this year, but this time, send in a story I'll be very proud of. And if I do that, I may have to pass on NaNoWriMo then. But again, we'll have to see how things go.
*looks back at old blog entries* I was gonna review Casual Gods? Damn, need to get on that.
Well, you get the idea.
A few quick things. I hate to do this, but since plans have changed very much for me this year, I will be unable to do the following: The Year of Revisits and ScriptFrenzy. For the former, I still plan on reviewing A House Like A Lotus in tribute of its rerelease this year. I may even read and review a few other of my all-time favorites, but not going to dedicate each month to one. As for the latter, I'm just not feeling it. I rather do NaNoWriMo again, which may happen again this year, but we'll have to see.
I may give the grad school application business another try later this year, but this time, send in a story I'll be very proud of. And if I do that, I may have to pass on NaNoWriMo then. But again, we'll have to see how things go.
*looks back at old blog entries* I was gonna review Casual Gods? Damn, need to get on that.
Well, you get the idea.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)